Difficulty

I made a few remarks about this topic in the last two posts, that is, difficulty in games. I think this is probably the hardest thing for a game developer to get right. The important thing to discover is the difference between challenging and hard.

When a game is challenging, the player is kept on their toes and have to use most of their ability to win. When they mess up, there are things that are easy to see which they need to fix. For instance, in street fighter, if you keep getting punished for throwing out some move that is -23 on block, it's not too difficult to realize that unsafe moves are called that for a reason. Stop using that move in that situation. You have only yourself to blame for getting beat for doing stupid things.

On the other hand, if a game is just plain hard, things get really frustrating. It's no longer a feeling that your skill beat the game. Now you just feel that it was luck. If you're playing street fighter and all of your cross-ups (requiring your opponent to guess if they need to block right or left), or your high-low mix-ups get blocked, its hard to win and it seems futile to attempt to. That's the thing with computer opponents though. They don't need to guess. They can have the ability to know what side an attack will land on. Game developers need to make them "stupid".

Of course it's not just about the game being hard. You also need to make things challenging, but not easy. If its easy, then its not fulfilling when you win. It seems to keep up the challenge in a game, there are a few routes a developer can go.

1) Introduce new enemies: If you are further into a game and you see a new enemy, you will not be surprised if he takes different tactics to kill or needs more work.

2) Increase the number of enemies spawned: If you are going to keep seeing the same enemies and their abilities will be the same as every other time you see them, you increase the difficulty of that encounter by having more enemies that need to be killed. You don't want to swarm them, but keep things hectic enough so that they can't pick off guys one at a time either.

3) Keep enemy difficulty a constant: No matter where you are in a game, enemy type A will always be .75 of your strength and enemy B will always be 1.5 times as strong. As you get stronger, so do they. This sort of makes sense, but at the same time, you, as a character were doing all these crazy things to get stronger. You opened the blue door with the blue key and killed the evil robot to get the new gun. The enemies, on the other hand, did not. Technically you have no idea what a later game enemy was doing while you were looking for the blue key, but since enemy AI tends to be very simple and static, you assume that they have just been patrolling their area, back and forth, for the past three hours, waiting for you to give them a lead salad. Enemy B did not get a text that said "The Hero has leveled up. Better do some push-ups"

Bioshack

Two in one day?! Crazysauce.

Just beat Bioshock. I really enjoyed it. I love the distopian art-deco look of Rapture. I'm also reading Atlas Shrugged right now, so that made an interesting combo as well.

I played the game on normal and it wasn't super difficult. Not that you should assume that normal is going to be really difficult, but on some games it is. Sure, I saved every three seconds because I don't like dying and was scared of things jumping out at me, but it was still good. The last boss was easier than I thought it would have been. Maybe I'm just that awesome.

I think it told a story very well, using audio journals left by people to tell it, rather than leaving countless books laying around that you have to read. I certainly applaud those whose job it is to write the filler books you find in RPGs, but you're playing a game... you usually don't want to have to pay attention to text.

Vroom Vroom

How many posts am I behind now? Two, once I do this one?

I bought GT5 yesterday. There are so many cars. Over 1000. That's all well and good, but it would be nice if there weren't twenty Skylines and fourteen Honda Civics. I understand that those cars have a large following and such, but having a different car would be much more interesting. Sure, I'm saying this partly because I'm not a car nut and am a casual player, but I assume that if there is a player who really likes their Civic EX or SE or whatever the letters are, they are happy they can get that car, but could care less about having seventeen Skylines. Maybe I just don't understand.

I like the license system in the game, because I like almost all training modes. The only problem I have, which is not something that can be fixed in the game, is that when I don't do well, I usually don't have any idea what I'm doing wrong. It's obvious when I do something in 15 seconds and its supposed to be 10... but when the difference between bronze and silver on my time is .05 of a second, there's no "Oh duh. Just brake here instead". The other thing that gets me is when, in trying to improve my time, I am barely shaving hundredths of a second off my time, but need to get at least a tenth or two off to get the time I want. It's tough because I'm struggling to gain so little and need to do a lot more. But, one thing I have noticed in regards to this, is that sometimes I just do it. All of a sudden I've shaved off the tenths and did what I want. This is due to the fact that I can't detect tenths and hundredths of a second. So I may not perceive any difference in my performance, but the clock says I did it faster.